Asrock J5040-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock J5040-ITX  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 20:12
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5040
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 40.3
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 137
45% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 268
36% 266 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM2OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 27 41 74 71 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 68.4
Write 73.3
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 56.6
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 13
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J5040-ITX Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J5040-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback