Asus ROG STRIX Z690-I GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive499% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-I GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 18:07
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$170
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 212
2-Core 422
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 802
8-Core 1,369
132% 1,086 Pts
64-Core 1,979
122% 1,979 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 115%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
MSI(1462 5052) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 219
Parallax 214
202% 227 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 160
Splatting 132
143% 182 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 166%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4175 4568 3022 1863 1868 1868 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
499% Outstanding
Read 2,644
Write 3,844
Mixed 2,692
SusWrite 2,894
684% 3,018 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 314
4K Mixed 120
404% 163 MB/s
DQ Read 2,215
DQ Write 1,853
DQ Mixed 2,023
1,518% 2030 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 499%
Great: 508%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
226GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1798 1684 1684 1677 1678 1675 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 2397
Write 2,196
Mixed 1,900
SusWrite 1,699
460% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 114
394% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 2287
DQ Write 1,831
DQ Mixed 1,985
1,506% 2,034 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 413%
Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 433 431 432 433 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 383
Write 449
Mixed 382
SusWrite 432
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 62.6
204% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 123
146% 254 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 5U6000C4016G-B 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 28.6
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-I GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 1,176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 250%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-I GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback