Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201206
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 10:24
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 25.4
1-Core 66
2-Core 121
37% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 359
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 9.6
5% 7.1 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot M.2 P300 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1003 504 296 310 303 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 816
Write 1,179
Mixed 703
SusWrite 460
178% 790 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 22.2
73% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 438
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 412
292% 376 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 231%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 PSD48G240081S 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 283
14% 283 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback