HP p6510y

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP p6510y  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 01:35
Run Duration454 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 84
37% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 162
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 401F) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4.9
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH25 255GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTPS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 73 25 26 28 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 136
Write 139
Mixed 176
SusWrite 42.1
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 8.3
24% 7.37 MB/s
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 106 106 106 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 119
Write 112
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 107
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.5% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6510y Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6510y

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback