Acer Veriton Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton Series  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H81H3-M4/V1.0
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 20:25
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 86
2-Core 186
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 260
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7E44) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.1
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 109 101 71 102 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.1% Average
Read 237
Write 153
Mixed 154
SusWrite 104
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 23.4
98% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 49.9
DQ Mixed 28.5
24% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
230GB free
Firmware: GH2OA440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 48 40 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 129
Write 41.8
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 39.2
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1311 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton Series Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback