Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3612QM 11,760 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 134 62% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 316 35% 278 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M 2,241 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3902) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 2 4% 3.8 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 4.5 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN09593 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 40 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 447 Write 420 Mixed 389 SusWrite 80.1 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 27.9 108% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 250 193% 262 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 17.2 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	465x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	107x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	98x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 3,567 samples	48x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,855 samples	46x
RMT3170EB68E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 29%, 609 samples	18x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16