HP Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1493
Memory0.1 GB free of 4.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 12:24
Run Duration485 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 46.8
2-Core 90.9
45% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 89
8-Core 90.5
12% 89.8 Pts
64-Core 90.1
6% 90.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel B43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 1493)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 2.8 13 2.9 19 6.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 8
2% 3.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
Read 31.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 4.3
12% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:85 02 PSD32G13332 ID:83 94 991586 38GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback