HP Engage Flex Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Engage Flex Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 840A
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 11:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 700
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 37.5
29% 37.8 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 551 533 491 492 458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 564
Write 442
Mixed 490
SusWrite 523
114% 505 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 56.2
189% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 408
319% 449 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 134%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Engage Flex Pro Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP Engage Flex Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback