Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 04:39
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 180
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 461
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 77
47% 64.1 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 43.4
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 461
Mixed 343
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 50.7
170% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 235
209% 315 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 1TB
37GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 394 372 376 339 306 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 461
Mixed 440
SusWrite 360
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 52.9
176% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
Asmt 2235 250GB
201GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 268 267 213 141 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 332
Write 391
Mixed 323
SusWrite 228
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 27.8
91% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 115
100% 147 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
847GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 137 140 139 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 173
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 137
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST8000NE0004-1ZF11G 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 196 197 197 196 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 178
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 195
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.5
267% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB
212GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 42 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 38.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 42.1
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 20.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 2,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback