Medion Akoya P5209 F/C085

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Akoya P5209 F/C085  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150908
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 22:36
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 139
54% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 238
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3203) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.35
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 35.6
30% 37.4 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 31.9
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 142 146 149 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 322
Write 275
Mixed 145
SusWrite 142
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 15.4
68% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 113
93% 133 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
679GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 187 193 194 196 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 145
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 190
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.5
306% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Akoya P5209 F/C085 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Medion Akoya P5209 F/C085

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback