Asus CM6650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6650  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6650
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 21:35
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 189
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 465
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B 4248) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10.7
6% 9.2 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 8
Splatting 6.4
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 170 174 174 192 180 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 210
Write 118
Mixed 167
SusWrite 179
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 27.9
90% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 36.3
30% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLZ302G08-MDJHB 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6650 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback