Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A555/G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK A555/G  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB3D
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 18:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
On Board, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 84
2-Core 146
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1895) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 6.8
4% 7 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000F0 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01F0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 246 270 288 277 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 434
Write 291
Mixed 227
SusWrite 275
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 30.7
104% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 220
184% 267 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK A555/G Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A555/G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback