Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FJ_R545FJ

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FJ_R545FJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X545FJ
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190920
Uptime	21.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '22 at 22:49
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	76%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10210U 54,859 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 113 2-Core 227 79% 141 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 326 37% 290 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 13EF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 7.8 5% 10.3 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 10.4 4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 120GB 2,214 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: S190429a SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 118 51 42 53 53 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 451 Write 386 Mixed 391 SusWrite 64.3 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 33.1 118% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 238 184% 248 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 101%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 844GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 117 119 115 119 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 88.8 Write 114 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 116 72% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.7 209% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 5,397 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 21.7 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 21.2 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FJ_R545FJ Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FJ_R545FJ

CPU
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	27x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	22x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	38x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	11x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	2x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	2x
TM8PS7256G 256GBTeamBench 70%, 5,014 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GBMicronBench 49%, 683 samples	27x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 1,684 samples	12x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 59%, 5,397 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16