HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 250 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A7
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 21:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 70
2-Core 127
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 195
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 379 387 388 392 386 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 441
Write 375
Mixed 378
SusWrite 386
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 29.1
109% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 118
131% 216 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 142 142 142 142 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 143
Write 134
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 141
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-010.A00G Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback