HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 250 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A7
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 21:40
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 130
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 196
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 84A7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.53% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 6.8
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 393 391 377 396 393 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 441
Write 379
Mixed 379
SusWrite 387
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 28.4
116% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 107
119% 195 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 142 143 142 143 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 147
Write 132
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 141
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
231% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-010.A00G Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback