Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive427% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMonster MARKUT M7 V5.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER MARKUT M7 V5.1
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 11:13
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 73
1-Core 170
2-Core 334
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,106
107% 878 Pts
64-Core 1,464
91% 1,464 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 1305) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 125
Parallax 11.8
8% 48.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
508GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2850 2090 1878 1841 1861 1871 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 3,079
Write 3,402
Mixed 3,115
SusWrite 2,066
657% 2,915 MB/s
4K Read 84.6
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 120
390% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,435
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 1,234
930% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 427%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 35.6
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 19.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MARKUT M7 V5.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback