Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 735 77% 615 Pts	64-Core 706 44% 706 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 5 4% 5.3 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 468 299 291 293 290 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 346 Mixed 411 SusWrite 351 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 48.8 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 64.5 219% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 351 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.4 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	496x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	472x
Pentium Gold G5400Intel $55Bench 62%, 15,354 samples	58x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	289x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	103x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	49x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GBCorsairBench 44%, 31,969 samples	28x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $113