Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 01:03
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 246
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 668
69% 556 Pts
64-Core 913
56% 913 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 240
Parallax 271
233% 266 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 251
Splatting 162
196% 252 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 197%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL1TB-D8 1TB
705GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 754 1276 236 1199 985 778 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,461
Write 1,529
Mixed 220
SusWrite 871
228% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 20.7
130% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 597
515% 762 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 187%
Great: 248%
Mushkin Striker 960GB-$336
190GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 428 452 473 472 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 475
Mixed 375
SusWrite 455
100% 441 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 33.2
127% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 185
180% 283 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 112%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
119GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,413
Write 2,178
Mixed 1,779
473% 2,123 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 76.5
252% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 981
751% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 148 149 148 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 145
Write 144
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 147
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3600C19-8GTZRB F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3600C19-8GTZRB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 29.6
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 25.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE - $759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,845
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback