HP t640 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP t640 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8523
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 18:21
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 91
2-Core 144
58% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 209
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
HP(103C 8523) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 8.3
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 115 115 113 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,328
Write 899
Mixed 871
SusWrite 149
180% 812 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 54
180% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 592
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 237
220% 351 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 137%
Great: 189%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.2 6.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 4.3
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 6.4
7% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t640 Thin Client Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP t640 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback