Asrock J4005M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock J4005M  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 17:12
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 34.9
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 102
36% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 84.9
14% 99.2 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.7
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 21 12 9.3 9.1 9.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 94%
USB Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.8 6.6 6.4 7.6 6.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.9
5% 3.97 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 228
18% 228 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4005M Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4005M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback