TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515KA_X515KA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515KA_X515KA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515KA
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 09:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 85
2-Core 169
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 276
35% 268 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 56.3%
 Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 197C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 7.6
6% 6.43 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 5.44%
 Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,108
Write 1,123
Mixed 996
240% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 34.7
114% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 621
468% 633 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 193%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-110.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 47.1%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515KA_X515KA Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515KA_X515KA

CPU
Pentium Silver N6000IntelBench 34%, 1,823 samples21x
Celeron N4500IntelBench 28%, 1,026 samples13x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 1,242 samples21x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples13x
SSD
OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GBKingstonBench 116%, 738 samples21x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples6x
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples3x
RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 14,450 samples8x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples7x
M471A5244BB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 92 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback