Acer Aspire A315-23

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-23  (all builds)
MotherboardDL Lotus_DA
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210218
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 01:55
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 22.8
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 116
36% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 140
23% 163 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 1456) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-128 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 519 532 216 119 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 610
Write 577
Mixed 564
SusWrite 323
116% 518 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 33.2
122% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 403
255% 288 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 173%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 31 34 52 20 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 128
Write 12.8
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 29.7
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P26KC4U1-BACS 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 15
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.3
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-23 Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-23

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback