| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 12.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 7 months ago, 2 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Amazon g4dn.xlarge (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Amazon |
| Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171016 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 24 '22 at 20:26 |
| Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 86% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
22.8%
Poor
|
36% 72 Pts
|
22% 161 Pts
|
10% 160 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
76.4%
Very good
|
73% 103 fps
|
82% 101 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
14% 4.97 GB/s
|
14% 5.07 GB/s
|
12% 341 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical g4dn.xlarge Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Amazon g4dn.xlarge
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |