Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 117
2-Core 205
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 601
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FE) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 31.8
25% 30.9 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 20.3
23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1101 256GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 223 194 248 195 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 660
Write 631
Mixed 589
SusWrite 224
118% 526 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 32.8
120% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 706
537% 729 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 110%
Great: 188%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 50 66 68 65 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 8.2
Write 27.6
Mixed 13
SusWrite 56.9
19% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 24.1
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback