Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X299 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 68.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 258
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 981
90% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,763
109% 1,763 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
201% Outstanding
Lighting 293
Reflection 281
Parallax 333
239% 302 fps
MRender 341
Gravity 248
Splatting 183
202% 257 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 201%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP600 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.8E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 266 265 266 180 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 367
Write 270
Mixed 245
SusWrite 227
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 39.7
139% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 146
146% 232 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 149 157 155 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 97.4
Write 151
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 150
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 32
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 9.2
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $977
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback