Walton TAMARIND EX310G Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWalton TAMARIND EX310G Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardWALTON TAMARIND EX310G Pro
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200819
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 11:03
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 171
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 265
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Clevo(1558 40D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6.9
6% 5.93 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 9.2
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walton SATA SSD 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMX1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 138 144 112 28 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53% Above average
Read 367
Write 303
Mixed 284
SusWrite 105
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 16.2
69% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 37
85% 177 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 53%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WT-S8G2666H 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 7.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TAMARIND EX310G Pro Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Walton TAMARIND EX310G Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback