Acer Aspire XC-705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-705
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 10:40
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 149
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 263
32% 246 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0750) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 4.4
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 187 193 195 195 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 365
Write 378
Mixed 256
SusWrite 201
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 38.7
144% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 208
180% 268 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 92%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
7GB free, PID 5786
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4 4.9 6.7 6 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 3
SusWrite 5.2
7% 6.95 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-705 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback