Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus Q87M-E (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140612
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '22 at 04:09
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$51 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 204 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 370 50% 374 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.7% Average	Lighting 58.4 Reflection 60.7 Parallax 79.2 48% 66.1 fps	MRender 60.7 Gravity 63.8 Splatting 44.5 45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(s) 128G 128GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN05872 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 83 100 46 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 353 Write 94.8 Mixed 76.4 SusWrite 73.1 32% 149 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 17.8 65% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 52.1 DQ Write 73 DQ Mixed 61.6 47% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 106%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 75GB free Firmware: 02.03E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 63 63 63 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 98.2 Write 100 Mixed 59.9 SusWrite 63.9 59% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 18GB free Firmware: 3.AHL SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 45 45 44 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 45.1 Write 43.9 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 43.8 30% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-YH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M391B5273CH0-YH9 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.1% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	230x
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	191x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	112x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	137x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	107x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	84x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	45x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	49x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	14x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16