Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '22 at 03:14
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 69.5 1-Core 146 2-Core 290 89% 169 Pts	4-Core 576 8-Core 983 95% 779 Pts	64-Core 2,182 135% 2,182 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 12FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.8% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 98.4 Parallax 99.2 86% 101 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 92.4 Splatting 84.5 79% 99 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 337 337 341 349 321 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 453 Write 389 Mixed 303 SusWrite 328 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 37.7 129% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 183 142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 2,797 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 8GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 77 77 76 73 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 119 Write 108 Mixed 118 SusWrite 73.8 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 23.6 76% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 35 DQ Mixed 27.6 21% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 134%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 179GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 4.5 3.8 3.7 4.1 6.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 64.2 Write 75.7 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 5.4 66% 50.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 50%
ST10000N M0086-2AA101 10TB 8TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.1% Good	Read 200 Write 138 Mixed 96.9 SusWrite 78.3 159% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.5 208% 2.87 MB/s

ST10000D M0004-1ZC101 10TB 737GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 4.5 3.9 3.7 4.1 6.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.6% Below average	Read 122 Write 125 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 5.4 102% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 178% 5.33 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB 7,244 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.1% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 26.9 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 26.3 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	837x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	572x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	342x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,032

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16