Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IC_FA706IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IC_FA706IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706IC
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211215
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 21:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,096
100% 841 Pts
64-Core 1,533
95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 120C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02.01
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.8% Good
Lighting 81.9
Reflection 74.6
Parallax 69.6
67% 75.4 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 52.9
49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1058 1232 1234 827 168 227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,375
Write 1,280
Mixed 1,163
SusWrite 791
259% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 70.7
238% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,024
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 790
552% 712 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 207%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 26.7
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 21.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IC_FA706IC Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IC_FA706IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback