Sicomputer Nauta 01C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSicomputer Nauta 01C  (all builds)
MotherboardSi NL40_50CU
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200911
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 18:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 196
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 515
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 40C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 8.5
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CLR-8W512 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EQ20901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 403 421 454 254 231 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1612
Write 1,283
Mixed 654
SusWrite 346
216% 974 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 10.8
135% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 198
223% 395 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 145%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS016G-H2666G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nauta 01C Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Sicomputer Nauta 01C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback