Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime6 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 156
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 270
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.9 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 31.4
26% 31.4 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 22.3
24% 30.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 378 401 348 174 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 395
Mixed 383
SusWrite 298
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 45.4
156% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 272
227% 328 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
755GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 152 154 154 154 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 155
Write 151
Mixed 104
SusWrite 150
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GIS F4-2400C17-8GIS 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 24.6
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback