Gigabyte GA-A7 K1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A7 K1  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 12:49
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 77.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1017
97% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,316
81% 1,316 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 70F2) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 132
Parallax 134
122% 138 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 107
Splatting 91.9
95% 120 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 110%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 1TB
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIOM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2489 2468 2437 2427 1670 1329 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 1913
Write 2,025
Mixed 2,120
SusWrite 2,137
463% 2,049 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 82.9
274% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,304
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 1,133
853% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 344%
Great: 460%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 28.6
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 29.5
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A7 K1 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A7 K1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback