Start START-DH61WWB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemStart START-DH61WWB3  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH61WW
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130610
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 08:52
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 358
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 9.5
7% 9.83 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.1
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Txrui X500 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0420A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 225 228 229 234 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 254
Write 222
Mixed 217
SusWrite 208
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 17.9
82% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 87.5
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 26.8
52% 101 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 83%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
120GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 106 104 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 45.1
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 105
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical START-DH61WWB3 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Start START-DH61WWB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback