ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140815
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '15 at 00:58
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 127 2-Core 252 86% 189 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 662 73% 577 Pts	64-Core 664 41% 664 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% EVGA(3842 2791) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.2% Very poor	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 60.2 Parallax 73.2 0% 44.7 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 50.2 Splatting 51.6 47% 58 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe 1,224 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	89.2% Excellent	Read 676 Write 390 Mixed 463 113% 510 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 19 89% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 84.3 113% 204 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 868GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 57090648 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 712 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 1377263 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 462 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 625 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 67 471007260 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 159 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4281 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 60129542172 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -115027814121296 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4643266724 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3462643556	103% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 162 Mixed 165 131% 174 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.33 109% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 784GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 99 12210296 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2035 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 1317294 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1067 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1745 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 65 4765974556 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 540 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 14017 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 -140737488355300 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 83623013253474 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4897361160 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3934358844	99.5% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 175 Mixed 156 126% 168 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.36 105% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 653GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 99 11991264 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1623 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 2889485 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 870 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1635 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 504561694 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 843 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4611 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 60129542174 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -82111184761189 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8262174488 (F2) Unknown 100 253 7138310502	76.2% Very good	Read 118 Write 146 Mixed 112 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.42 4K Mixed 0.91 230% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	200x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	136x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	23x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBCorsairBench 63%, 2,608 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	12x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $971

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback