MSI FM2-A75MA-P33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A75MA-P33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '17 at 21:30
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 144
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 246
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
Sapphire(174B 3001) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.947.0.0
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 60.2
33% 44.3 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 40.7
33% 39.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 455
Write 127
Mixed 186
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 15.9
76% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 41.7
59% 109 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 73%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
915GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
48% Average
Read 87.4
Write 79.3
Mixed 76
61% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.39
111% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-10-9 D3-1866 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A75MA-P33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A75MA-P33 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback