Asus P5GZ-MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus P5GZ-MX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5GZ-MX
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 23.5
30% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 28.3
8-Core 31.1
4% 29.7 Pts
64-Core 32.3
2% 32.3 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEA2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 80 79 78 82 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 214
Write 148
Mixed 166
SusWrite 96.2
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 18.7
72% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 29.8
27% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 85%
Samsung SP0411N 34GB
24GB free
Firmware: TW100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 51 51 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 52
Mixed 34
SusWrite 50.5
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.74% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.43 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.74%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5GZ-MX Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P5GZ-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback