HP 500-235eb

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 500-235eb  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 11:38
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 170
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 323
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3170 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.2% Good
Lighting 83.4
Reflection 83.2
Parallax 88.7
68% 85.1 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 64.3
57% 70 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 135 131 127 127 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 479
Write 183
Mixed 190
SusWrite 136
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 31.6
116% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 176
138% 195 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 109 110 107 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 144
Write 151
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 110
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-235eb Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP 500-235eb

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback