HP Desktop Pro A G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop Pro A G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8534
Memory4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200806
Uptime12.8 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 04:33
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 102
2-Core 208
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 593
54% 452 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Amdradeont RX Vega 11 Graphics
HP(103C 8534) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 25.7
13% 18.1 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 13.8
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
660GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 23 23 35 96 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 7.5
Write 56.6
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 50.2
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2666, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop Pro A G2 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop Pro A G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback