HP 550-003no

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP 550-003no  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B35
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 19:57
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 119
50% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 167
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Series + R7 240 Dual Graphics
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.201.1001.1007
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10.3
6% 9.03 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 8
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 32 31 33 30 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 336
Write 37.8
Mixed 73
SusWrite 37
26% 121 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 12.2
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 38.1
DQ Write 49.5
DQ Mixed 17.7
21% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
913GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 170 169 167 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 169
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 168
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-003no Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-003no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback