Asrock B450M/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac  (all builds)
Memory40.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 10:18
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 282
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 960
91% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 169 37 102 100 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 454
Write 366
Mixed 311
SusWrite 127
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 15.4
62% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 29.9
42% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 106%
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 2TB
463GB free
Firmware: 1084
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 339 316 337 319 337 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 324
Write 361
Mixed 338
SusWrite 322
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 44.1
143% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 230
171% 225 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 3200 C16 Series DDR4 3000 47GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 32767, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 22.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M/ac Builds (Compare 1,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback