Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive408% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 09:18
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 949
84% 712 Pts
64-Core 4,133
256% 4,133 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 4004) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 192
Parallax 193
151% 190 fps
MRender 209
Gravity 165
Splatting 139
136% 171 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 4 3TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3999 3926 3993 4142 4566 4531 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
408% Outstanding
Read 2,097
Write 4,166
Mixed 1,827
SusWrite 4193
699% 3,071 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 38.2
140% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 557
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 579
432% 571 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 408%
Great: 422%
Amd-raid Array 5 1TB
854GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 340 340 340 332 334 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,564
Write 1,866
Mixed 1,524
SusWrite 334
297% 1,322 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 49.3
160% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 560
426% 572 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 159%
Great: 454%
Amd-raid Array 3 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 343 343 343 335 338 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 307
Write 78.6
Mixed 110
SusWrite 333
151% 207 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
201% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 184%
Great: 183%
Seagate ST4000DM006-2G5107 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 214 215 211 206 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 210
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 205
125% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
297% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 121%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST6000NM0115-1YZ110 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 186 188 187 182 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 183
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 180
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1
288% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-3866C18-8GTZR 64GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 34.1
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 32.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,030
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback