Asrock A785GM-LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A785GM-LE  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 04:47
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 38
2-Core 67
35% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 70
8-Core 73.7
10% 71.8 Pts
64-Core 71.4
4% 71.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Asus(1043 02A8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725040VLA360 400GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5COA58A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 52 54 43 48 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 54.4
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 47.3
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
333, 333 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A785GM-LE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A785GM-LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback