ZMAX DT02 BV1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZMAX DT02 BV1  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMH61P1
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 15:02
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 137
59% 98 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 141
25% 175 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.8.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 78.2
48% 65.5 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 43.3
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GB0500C4413 500GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 49 44 53 55 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 46.1
Write 42
Mixed 30
SusWrite 46.6
30% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 44%
EM200AA001-9VY132 200GB
28GB free
Firmware: EMP1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 56.9
Write 62.2
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 51.2
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WALRAM P4-4G-1333 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DT02 BV1 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ZMAX DT02 BV1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback