Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 175
2-Core 333
103% 195 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 1,132
108% 893 Pts
64-Core 1,482
92% 1,482 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8827) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 174
Parallax 167
150% 175 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2319 2373 1891 1532 1574 1603 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,647
Write 2,429
Mixed 1,823
SusWrite 1,882
493% 2,195 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 93.4
311% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,356
DQ Write 970
DQ Mixed 1,137
856% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 369%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1404 1408 1405 1401 1391 1394 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,455
Write 1,438
Mixed 1,605
SusWrite 1,400
385% 1,724 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 93.1
307% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,423
DQ Write 1,078
DQ Mixed 1228
924% 1,243 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 335%
Great: 435%
Seagate Expansion HDD 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1801
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 159 166 167 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 80.4
Write 157
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 162
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.7
340% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 210 210 210 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Lacie Fuel 2TB
110GB free
Firmware: 780B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 69
Write 59
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 58.9
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37%
Great: 65%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
89GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 5.7
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 5.7
8% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.3
223% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 30.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 22.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $967
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback