Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4200-$99 5,474 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 61.8 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 61 35% 51.4 Pts	4-Core 62.5 8-Core 61.2 8% 61.8 Pts	64-Core 61.7 4% 61.7 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT 3,959 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Compal(14C0 0031) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 0.9 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 25 11 11 9.8 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 56.8 Write 59.2 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 17.1 31% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	2x
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $130Bench 34%, 4,995 samples	1x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9600M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 3,959 samples	5x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $34Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $54