Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P REV 3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2P REV 3.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130318
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 09:54
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 121
55% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 178
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Nvidia(10DE 0585) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 4.4
8% 8.73 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 3.5
5% 6.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vc-500 120G 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0703A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 205
Write 182
Mixed 178
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 20
93% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 24.4
27% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 94%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170
4TB free
Firmware: AV01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 206
Write 196
Mixed 98
123% 166 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
1,294% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S2P REV 3.0 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2P REV 3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback