Lenovo 20S5S0CC0F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 34% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20S5S0CC0F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20S5S0CC0F
Memory38.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211228
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 21:09
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 36%
CPU Throttled 34%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10610U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 241
79% 146 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 591
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 8.4
5% 5.53 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,084
Write 783
Mixed 453
170% 773 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 50.8
193% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 446
362% 523 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 47GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 32767 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.6% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 17.8
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 19.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20S5S0CC0F Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20S5S0CC0F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback