MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7673
MotherboardMSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120801
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 19:20
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 167
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 337
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 52.5
46% 55.6 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 46.6
43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 453
Mixed 360
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 44.2
154% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Intel SSDSA2CT040G3 40GB
6GB free
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 48 48 47 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 189
Write 47.8
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 47.3
19% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 16.8
65% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 52.4
45% 68 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 37%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 119 123 125 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 114
Write 72.4
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 120
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
364GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 57 57 58 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 88.9
Write 57.1
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 56.3
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
238GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 107 106 106 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 120
Write 101
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 105
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
191% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C9-8GTX F3-2133C9-8GTX 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-C45 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback