Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6700-$230 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 68.5 35% 54.1 Pts	4-Core 68.8 8-Core 67.8 9% 68.3 Pts	64-Core 69.1 4% 69.1 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450 10,238 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 3027) 2GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.3 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 113 118 121 120 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 118 Write 118 Mixed 105 SusWrite 117 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 8.2 65% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 66.4 DQ Mixed 9.1 17% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.2 8% 2.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 6700Intel $230Bench 39%, 2,388 samples	2x
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7450AMDBench 2%, 10,238 samples	2x
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $272

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16